4.7 Article

White cabbage fermentation improves ascorbigen content, antioxidant and nitric oxide production inhibitory activity in LPS-induced macrophages

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 46, 期 1, 页码 77-83

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2011.10.023

关键词

Starter culture; Sauerkraut; Ascorbigen; Antioxidant activity; Anti-inflammatory activity

资金

  1. Spanish Commission of Science and Technology (CICYT). [AGL2007-62044]
  2. CSIC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Consumption of foods rich in dietary antioxidants and anti-inflammatory compounds is becoming a key strategy to lower oxidative stress and inflammation. The objective of this work was to study the effect of fermentation and starter culture on ascorbigen (ABG) and vitamin C content, as well as antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of white cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata cv. Megaton). Lactobacillus plantarum CECT 748 (LP), Leuconostoc mesenteroides CECT 219 (LM) or a mixed culture of both strains at 1:1 ratio (LPM) were used as starter cultures in sauerkraut manufacture. Microbiological and sensorial quality of sauerkraut was also examined. White cabbage fermentation increased (P < 0.05) ABG content (up to 12-fold), oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) values (up to 2-fold) and NO production inhibitory potency (up to 2.6-fold). Vitamin C content slightly decreased (P < 0.05) up to 1.4-fold during fermentation. LM sauerkraut showed the highest (P < 0.05) ABG concentration (204.8 mu mol/100 g d.w.), ORAC values (164.0 mu mol Trolox/g d.w.) and NO inhibitory potency (IC50 = 60.8 mu g extract/mL). The microbiological quality of LM, LP and LPM sauerkrauts was satisfactory. Experimental sauerkrauts showed higher overall acceptability (P < 0.05) compared to commercial products. Consequently, selection of starter culture is of great importance in the manufacture of sauerkraut with improved content of bioactive compounds and health-promoting potential. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据