4.7 Article

Composition and biological activities of the essential oil from Schisandra chinensis obtained by solvent-free microwave extraction

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 44, 期 10, 页码 2047-2052

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2011.05.013

关键词

Schisandra chinensis; Essential oil; Antioxidant activity; Solvent-free microwave extraction

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DLO9BB48]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Applicability of solvent-free microwave extraction (SFME) for extraction of the fruits of Schisandra chinensis essential oil was examined; the composition and antioxidant activities and antibacterial activities of the essential oil were assessed in vitro. An orthogonal experiment (L-9(3)(4)) was applied to optimize the extraction process. The optimum conditions were: extraction time, 45 min; microwave power, 800 W; diameter of powder particles, 0.25 mm; and proportion of water pretreatment, 30%. Under these conditions, the extraction yield was 1.75%. Thirty-five compounds, representing 91.12% of the oil, were identified, of which the major ones, ylangene (50.11%), beta-himachalene (10.76%), alpha-bergamotene (9.52%) and beta-Chamigrene (5.41%), accounted for of 75.80% the oil. Antioxidant activity, IC50 value of the essential oil was determined as 3.87 mg/mL by DPPH assay, and the inhibition values of the essential oil at 1.8 mg/mL was 41.88% by beta-Carotene-linoleic acid bleaching assay. The essential oil was screened for antibacterial activity against both Gram positive (Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis) and Gram negative (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus vulgaris) bacteria. The essential oil showed antibacterial effect against all the gram (+) bacteria and gram (-) bacteria tested. These results show that S. chinensis essential oil could be considered as a natural alternative to food antioxidants and preservatives. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据