4.7 Article

Carotenoid and flavanone content during refrigerated storage of orange juice processed by high-pressure, pulsed electric fields and low pasteurization

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 44, 期 4, 页码 834-839

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2010.12.013

关键词

Orange juice; High-pressure; Pulsed electric fields; Low pasteurization; Carotenoids; Flavanones; Refrigerated storage

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [AGL2006-12758-C02-01/ALI, AGL2008-04798/CO2-01/ALI]
  2. Program Consolider-Ingenio [CSD2007-00063]
  3. European Union [FP6-FOOD-023140]
  4. Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The impact of different processing technologies, including non-thermal technologies, on bioactive compounds of orange juice was investigated. Freshly squeezed orange juice was treated by high pressure (HP) (400 MPa/40 degrees C/1 min), pulsed electric fields (PEF) (35 kV cm(-1)/750 mu s) and low pasteurization (LPT) (70 degrees C/30 s). The stability of main carotenoids and flavanones was studied just after treatment and during 40 days of refrigerated storage at 4 degrees C. Just after treatment, HP juice showed a significant increase on total carotenoid and flavanone content extracted (45.19 and 15.46%, respectively) and on vitamin A value (30.89%) with regard untreated juice, whereas no significant changes were observed for PEF and LFT juices. For all treated orange juices, flavanone content decreased significantly (around 50%) during the first 20 days of storage at 4 degrees C while carotenoid content showed a moderate decrease (less than 11%) that took place during the last 20 days. In general, during refrigerated storage, carotenoids and flavanones remained higher in HP juice than in LPT and PEF juices. Hence, HP and PEF technologies were as effective o even more than LPT to preserve bioactive compounds in orange juice during refrigerated storage. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据