4.7 Article

Profiling brewers' spent grain for composition and microbial ecology at the site of production

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 43, 期 6, 页码 890-896

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2010.01.019

关键词

Brewers'spent grain; Barley; Microbiology; Polysaccharide; Phenolic; Protein

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) UK
  2. Commission of the European Communities [FOOD-CT-2005-006922]
  3. BBSRC [BBS/E/F/00044476] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/F/00044476, BBS/E/F/00042086] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Brewers' spent grain (BSG) is a readily available, high volume low cost byproduct of brewing and is a potentially valuable resource for industrial exploitation. The variation in BSG composition and the implications for microbiological spoilage by a resident microflora might affect the potential to use BSG as a reliable food-grade industrial feedstock for value-added downstream processing. Fresh samples of BSG from a range of 10 breweries have been analysed for their microbial and chemical composition. The results show that a resident microflora of mainly thermophilic aerobic bacteria (<10(7) g(-1) fresh weight) persists on BSG. This population is susceptible to rapid change but at the point of production BSG can be considered microbiologically stable. Chemically, BSG is rich in polysaccharides, protein and lignin. Residual starch can contribute up to 13% of the dry weight and BSG from lager malts has higher protein content than that from ale. In general, at the point of production, BSG is a relatively uniform chemical feedstock available for industrial upgrading. Differences between breweries should not present problems when considering BSG for industrial exploitation but susceptibility to microbial colonisation is identified as a potential problem area which might restrict its successful exploitation. Crown Copyright (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据