4.7 Article

Effect of extrusion conditions on physical and chemical properties of high protein glutinous rice-based snack

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 42, 期 3, 页码 781-787

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2008.09.011

关键词

Glutinous rice; Extrusion; Lysine; Non-protein nitrogen

资金

  1. International Collaboration for Doctoral Degree Program
  2. Ministry of the University Affairs
  3. Royal Thai Government
  4. Massey University, New Zealand
  5. Graduate School of Kasetsart University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two glutinous rice-based snack formulations were designed using a linear-programming model to minimize total cost to meet the FAO/WHO/UNU. (1985). Energy and protein requirements. Report of a joint FAO/WHO/UNU expert consultation. Technical report series 724. Geneva: WHO requirements for lysine and sulphur amino acids. Effects of protein concentration, feed moisture content and barrel temperature on the chemical and physical properties of the extruded product were investigated. Response surfaces for the parameters were generated using a second-degree polynomial. The high protein nutritious snack was obtained using glutinous rice flour, vital wheat gluten and toasted soy grits. A factorial design was employed to investigate the influence of feed protein content (20 and 30 g/100 g wb), feed moisture (20, 25, and 30 g/100 g wb) and barrel temperature (150 and 180 degrees C) on the physical and chemical properties of extrudates. Results showed that increasing feed moisture and reducing barrel temperature reduced non-protein nitrogen (NPN) and enhanced lysine retention. The protein and moisture content of raw material and barrel temperature had no significant influence on cysteine and methionine content. The conditions providing high expansion, low bulk density, and low shear strength of extruded snack were feed moisture of 20 g/100 g wb and 180 degrees C. Crown Copyright (c) 2008 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Swiss Society of Food Science and Technology. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据