4.3 Article

Viruses as potential pathogenic agents in systemic lupus erythematosus

期刊

LUPUS
卷 23, 期 6, 页码 596-605

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0961203314531637

关键词

autoimmunity; peptides; Systemic lupus erythematosus; autoantibodies; molecular mimicry; environmental factors; human endogenous retroviruses

资金

  1. South Staffordshire Medical Foundation
  2. Rotha Abraham Bequest
  3. Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals Charity
  4. New Cross Kidney Patients Association
  5. James Beattie Charitable Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genetic and environmental factors appear to contribute to the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Viral infections have been reported to be associated with the disease. A number of exogenous viruses have been linked to the pathogenesis of SLE, of which Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) has the most evidence of an aetiological candidate. In addition, human endogenous retroviruses (HERV), HRES-1, ERV-3, HERV-E 4-1, HERV-K10 and HERV-K18 have also been implicated in SLE. HERVs are incorporated into human DNA, and thus can be inherited. HERVs may trigger an autoimmune reaction through molecular mimicry, since homology of amino acid sequences between HERV proteins and SLE autoantigens has been demonstrated. These viruses can also be influenced by oestrogen, DNA hypomethylation, and ultraviolet light (UVB) exposure which have been shown to enhance HERV activation or expression. Viral infection, or other environmental factors, could induce defective apoptosis, resulting in loss of immune tolerance. Further studies in SLE and other autoimmune diseases are needed to elucidate the contribution of both exogenous and endogenous viruses in the development of autoimmunity. If key peptide sequences could be identified as molecular mimics between viruses and autoantigens, then this might offer the possibility of the development of blocking peptides or antibodies as therapeutic agents in SLE and other autoimmune conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据