4.3 Article

High concomitance of disease marker autoantibodies in anti-DFS70/LEDGF autoantibody-positive patients with autoimmune rheumatic disease

期刊

LUPUS
卷 17, 期 3, 页码 171-176

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0961203307086311

关键词

anti-DFS70/LEDGF antibody; anti-nuclear antibody; autoantigen; disease marker

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Autoantibodies against dense fine speckles 70 (DFS70) are found in 10% of healthy individuals, but only in a tiny population of patients with autoimmune rheumatic disease. The antibody may thus be a marker of autoimmune rheumatic disease negativity. To investigate this possibility, we examined the presence of various disease-marker autoantibodies in anti-DFS70 antibody-positive patients with autoimmune rheumatic disease. Serum samples from 500 patients with various types of autoimmune rheumatic disease were examined for anti-DFS70 antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence and immunoblotting. Various disease-marker autoantibodies were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Twenty-two patients were positive for anti-DFS70 antibodies. Eighteen patients also had disease-marker autoantibodies including anti-double stranded DNA, anti-cardiolipin, anti-SS-A, or other antibodies. In one patient with Sjogren syndrome and two patients with dermatomyositis, no disease-marker antibodies were found; however, one patient with dermatomyositis had a concomitant anti-cytoplasmic antibody. All seven systemic lupus erythematosus patients fulfilled the classification criteria for this disease even if anti-nuclear antibody-positive findings were excluded. One patient with morphea had high-titer anti-single stranded DNA antibody. According to this and previous studies, patients with only anti-DFS70 antibody are rarely diagnosed as having autoimmune rheumatic disease. Recognizing dense fine speckle patterns in anti-nuclear antibodies tests is, thus, very important for analysis of laboratory results in rheumatology clinics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据