4.5 Article

Circulating tumor cell detection in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients by multi-marker QPCR analysis

期刊

LUNG CANCER
卷 75, 期 2, 页码 242-247

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.07.003

关键词

Advanced non-small cell lung cancer; Circulating tumor cell; CTC; Detection; Quantitative PCR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The aim of this study was to explore circulating tumor cell (CTC) detection in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). CTCs may not only serve as a prognostic marker in selected tumor types, but may also be useful as pharmacodynamic marker in drug development. Methods: Fourty-six advanced NSCLC patients and fourty-six healthy controls were included in the study and 8.0 ml of peripheral blood was obtained from each of the participants. Immunomagnetic bead enrichment for cells expressing epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) was performed, followed by multi-marker quantitative real-time PCR of a panel of marker genes: cytokeratin 7 (CK7), cytokeratin 19 (CK19), human epithelial glycoprotein (EGP) and fibronectin 1 (FN1). Using quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA), expression values were combined into a single score, which indicated CTC-positivity or -negativity. Test characteristics were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: ROC curve analysis showed capability of discrimination between advanced NSCLC patients and healthy controls (area = 0.712; 95% CI 0.606-0.819; P<0.001). A cut-off minimizing overall misclassification for QDA-positivity reached a sensitivity of 46% (95% CI 31-61) and a specificity of 93% (95% CI 82-99). Conclusions: In this exploratory study, an assay was developed for discriminating CFCs in peripheral blood samples of advanced NSCLC patients from healthy controls. The assay demonstrated an acceptable sensitivity in combination with good specificity. Further validation studies should take place in NSCLC patients and a matched control group. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据