4.5 Article

Impact of specific mutant KRAS on clinical outcome of EGFR-TKI-treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with an EGFR wild type genotype

期刊

LUNG CANCER
卷 78, 期 1, 页码 81-86

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2012.06.005

关键词

EGFR; Erlotinib; EGFR-TKI; Gefitinib; KRAS; Non-small cell lung cancer

资金

  1. Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: This retrospective study was undertaken to investigate the impact of specific mutant KRAS on clinical outcome to either gefitinib or erlotinib (EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, EGFR-TKI) in patients with EGFR wild type (WT) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Patients with an EGFR WT genotype who were treated with an EGFR-TKI for advanced disease at our Institution were identified. Simultaneous availability of KRAS mutation status was required for study inclusion. Results: Sixty-seven patients were eligible. Median age was 60 years (39-84), and 10 patients (14.9%) had received an EGFR-TKI as upfront therapy. Overall, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 2.9 months and 18.0 months, respectively. KRAS mutant patients (n = 18) experienced a significantly shorter PFS compared with those carrying a KRAS WT genotype (n = 49) (1.6 months vs 3.0 months, respectively, P = 0.04: HR = 1.92). However, within the KRAS mutant group a great variability in terms of sensitivity to treatment was noted (PFS ranging from 0.7 months to 38.7 months). KRAS codon 13 mutant patients (n = 4) experienced the worse outcome when compared with KRAS codon 12 mutants (n = 14) and KRAS WT patients (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.01 for PFS and OS, respectively). Conclusions: Though we found that EGFR WT/KRAS mutant advanced NSCLC patients are associated with an increased resistance to treatment, specific mutant KRAS may account for differential sensitivity to an EGFR-TKI. KRAS codon 13 mutants are those who seem to experience the worse clinical outcome. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据