4.5 Article

A phase II study of enzastaurin in combination with erlotinib in patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer

期刊

LUNG CANCER
卷 78, 期 1, 页码 57-62

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2012.06.003

关键词

NSCLC; Erlotinib; Enzastaurin

资金

  1. Eli Lilly and Company
  2. Genentech
  3. Stanford NIH/NCRR CTSA [UL1 RR025744]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Regardless of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status, erlotinib improves survival for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after one or more chemotherapy regimens. Enzastaurin is an oral serine/threonine kinase inhibitor. This phase II study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of erlotinib and enzastaurin in NSCLC, a combination with promise to overcome EGFR resistance based on preclinical models. Methods: Eligible patients with advanced NSCLC (IIIB or IV) who had failed one or two prior systemic treatment regimen(s) were enrolled and received erlotinib 150 mg/day and enzastaurin 500 mg/day (after a 1125-mg loading dose on day 1, cycle 1), both orally in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: From January 2008 to July 2009,49 patients were enrolled: 29(59%) men and 20(41%) women; 8 (16%) were non-smokers. The median PFS was 1.7 months (one-sided 90% Cl: 1.5-NA) and median overall survival (OS) was 8.3 months (95% CI: 5.3-14.3). Five patients had partial response, for an overall response rate of 10.2%; the disease control rate was 30.6% (responders + 10 patients with stable disease). Grade 3-4 drug-related adverse events in >= 5% of patients were diarrhea, acne, and nausea. One possibly drug-related death due to interstitial lung disease occurred during the study. Conclusions: In previously treated, unselected, advanced NSCLC patients, the addition of enzastaurin to erlotinib did not improve PFS, response, or OS compared with historical data of single-agent erlotinib, but was well tolerated. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据