4.5 Article

EGFR gene copy number in adenocarcinoma of the lung by FISH analysis: Investigation of significantly related factors on CT, FDG-PET, and histopathology

期刊

LUNG CANCER
卷 64, 期 2, 页码 179-186

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2008.08.003

关键词

EGFR; FISH; EGFR gene copy number; CT; FDG-PET; Adenocarcinoma; Lung

资金

  1. Seoul National University Hospital Research Fund [04-2005-032]
  2. Sang Koo Hahn Research Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It has been suggested that a high EGFR gene copy number may be an indicator of good response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy and a marker of poor prognosis in NSCLC. However, imaging features related to EGFR gene copy number status in adenocarcinoma are still unknown. We therefore retrospectively analyzed CT, FDG-PET, and histopathologic slides of surgical resected lung adenocarcinoma in 132 patients. Tumor characteristics on preoperative chest-CT, such as, GGO proportions, tumor diameters, and cavitation: FDG-PET SUVmax; and histopathologically determined differentiation degrees and tumor subtypes were evaluated. EGFR gene copy number status was categorized as FISH-positive or -negative. FISH-positivity was found in 53 patients (40.2%) and was significantly more frequent in tumors with a SUVmax > 7.0 (P = 0.007). Furthermore, FISH-negativity was found to be more frequent in tumors with a GGO > 50% (P = 0.023) and diameter <15.5 mm (P = 0.006) on CT, or a well-differentiated histopathology (P = 0.002). Moreover, the frequency of FISH-positivity increased as SUVmax increased (P = 0.0008) and as the proportion of GGO decreased (P = 0.01). SUVmax > 7.0 was an independent predictor of FISH-positive results (odds ratio, 3.941; 95% CI, 1.691-9.182; P = 0.01). In conclusion, a high SUVmax on FDG-PET was significantly related to FISH-positive results. A high proportion of GGO, small tumor diameter on CT, and a well-differentiated histopathology were more frequent in FISH-negative adenocarcinomas. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据