4.5 Article

Motivational readiness for physical activity and quality of life in long-term lung cancer survivors

期刊

LUNG CANCER
卷 61, 期 1, 页码 117-122

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.12.012

关键词

exercise; quality of life; survivor; physical activity; symptom control; motivational readiness; stage of change

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA084354-08, R01 CA115857-03, R01 CA084354-10, R01 CA084354-06, R01 CA084354-05, R01 CA115857, R01 CA084354-02, R01 CA084354, R01 CA084354-01A2, R01 CA084354-09, R01 CA084354-03, R01 CA084354-04, R01 CA084354-07] Funding Source: Medline
  2. PHS HHS [R01-84354, R01-115879] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Little is known about the relationship between motivational readiness for physical activity and quality of life (QOL) in long-term lung cancer survivors. Long-term survivors are considered those who are living 5 years or more following a cancer diagnosis. This project examined the relationship between a self-report measure of motivational readiness for physical activity and QOL in a sample of 272 long-term lung cancer survivors. Participants (54% mate, average age 70 years old) completed the mailed survey an average of 6 years after being diagnosed with lung cancer. Survey measures included the stage of change for physical activity and a set of single item QOL and symptom scales. Thirty-seven percent of respondents reported they currently engaged in regular physical activity (a total of 30 min or more per day, atleast 5 days per week). Kruskal-Wallis tests revealed that those who reported engaging in regular physical activity reported a better overall QOL, better QOL on all five domains of QOL functioning (mental, physical, social, emotional, and spiritual), and fewer symptoms compared to those with a sedentary lifestyle. Physical activity level may have important QOL and symptom management benefits for tong-term lung cancer survivors. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据