4.5 Article

Potentially functional polymorphisms of EXO1 and risk of lung cancer in a Chinese population:: A case-control analysis*

期刊

LUNG CANCER
卷 60, 期 3, 页码 340-346

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.11.003

关键词

EXO1; MMR; Polymorphisms; lung cancer; susceptibility; molecular epidemiology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exonuctease 1 (EXO1) is an important nucleases involved in mismatch repair system that contributes to maintain genomic stability, to modulate DNA recombination, and to mediate cell cycle arrest. Potentially functional polymorphisms in EXO1 may alter cancer risks by influencing the repair activity of EX01. Therefore, we hypothesized that single nucteotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in EX01 were associated with risk of lung cancer. To test this hypothesis, we genotyped five common SNPs (rs1776177A/G, rs1047840G/A (Gtu589Lys), rs1776148G/A (Gly670Glu), rs9350C/T (Leu757Pro) and rs851797T/C) that tag eight SNPs located at exon regions of EX01 by using the Ilumina high-throughput genotyping platform in 500 incident lung cancer cases and 517 cancer-free controls in a Chinese population. Significant differences of allele and genotype distributions were observed in Gtu589Lys (rs1047840) of EX01 between the cases and controls (P=0.028 and 0.025 for allele and genotype distributions, respectively). Logistic regression analyses revealed that individuals carrying the variant 589Lys allele (589Glu/Lys or 589Lys/Lys) had a significantly increased risk of lung cancer [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.41, 95% confidential interval (Cl) = 1.09-1.84] compared with those who carried the wild-type homozygote (589Glu/Glu). Furthermore, we found that haplotype AAGTT was more frequent in cases than in controls (P < 0.001 for both two-sided chi(2)-test and 1000 times permutation tests). These results suggest that the EXO1 Glu589Lys polymorphism and its surrounding regions might be genetic susceptibility markers for lung cancer in this study population. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据