4.5 Article

TIMP-1 Promotes the Immune Response in Influenza-Induced Acute Lung Injury

期刊

LUNG
卷 196, 期 6, 页码 737-743

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00408-018-0154-2

关键词

Timp1; Influenza; PR8; Acute lung injury

资金

  1. NIH [HL120947, HL103868, HL137076]
  2. Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute Lung Cancer Research Award
  3. American Heart Association
  4. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL120947, R01HL137076, R01HL103868] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R01AI118719] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction Influenza infects millions of people each year causing respiratory distress and death in severe cases. On average, 200,000 people annually are hospitalized in the United States for influenza related complications. Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1), a secreted protein that inhibits MMPs, has been found to be involved in lung inflammation. Here, we evaluated the role of TIMP-1 in the host response to influenza-induced lung injury. Methods Wild-type (WT) and Timp1-deficient (Timp1(-/-)) mice that were 8-12 weeks old were administered A/PR/8/34 (PR8), a murine adapted H1N1 influenza virus, and euthanized 6 days after influenza installation. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and lungs were harvested from each mouse for ELISA, protein assay, PCR, and histological analysis. Cytospins were executed on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid to identify immune cells based on morphology and cell count. Results WT mice experienced significantly more weight loss compared to Timp1(-/-) mice after influenza infection. WT mice demonstrated more immune cell infiltrate and airway inflammation. Interestingly, PR8 levels were identical between the WT and Timp1(-/-) mice 6 days post-influenza infection. Conclusion The data suggest that Timp1 promotes the immune response in the lungs after influenza infection facilitating an injurious phenotype as a result of influenza infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据