4.5 Article

Estrogen Replacement Therapy Prevents Airway Dysfunction in a Murine Model of Allergen-Induced Asthma

期刊

LUNG
卷 187, 期 2, 页码 116-127

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00408-008-9129-z

关键词

Allergic asthma; Estrogen; TGF beta; Mouse; In vivo

资金

  1. Medical College of Georgia Research Institute STP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We previously reported that 17 beta-estradiol (E-2) prevents hyperresponsiveness to carbachol of murine asthmatic tracheal rings in vitro. We now investigated whether E-2 is similarly effective in reducing airway hyperreactivity in a murine model of allergic asthma in vivo. Female ovariectomized BALB/c mice were rendered asthmatic by a 25-day protocol of sensitization to ovalbumin. Under positive-pressure ventilation, anesthetized asthmatic mice exhibited a dramatic increase in airway responsiveness to increasing doses of inhaled methacholine compared to PBS-sensitized controls, as reflected in decreased dynamic compliance of the respiratory system and increased tissue damping, tissue elastance, and airway resistance. Furthermore, asthmatic mice exhibited hypercellularity and increased protein concentration in the bronchoalveolar lavage, strong signs of peribronchial cuffing with inflammatory cells and increased goblet cell activity. To test the effects of estrogen, three additional groups of mice were implanted subcutaneously with different amounts of slow-release E-2 pellets at the time of ovariectomy and rendered asthmatic as before. E-2 dose-dependently inhibited airway hyperresponsiveness to methacholine, reduced bronchoalveolar lavage hypercellularity, and virtually eliminated histologic signs of inflammation and goblet cell hyperactivity. The inflammation and airway hyperactivity in asthmatic mice was associated with an increase in bronchoalveolar lavage levels of TGF beta 1, which was completely abolished in E-2-treated asthmatic mice. We conclude that estrogen replacement therapy effectively ameliorates the pathologic profile of murine allergic asthma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据