4.5 Article

Spectroscopic and molecular simulation studies on the interaction of di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate and human serum albumin

期刊

LUMINESCENCE
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 198-206

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bio.2713

关键词

di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate; human serum albumin; binding characteristic; fluorescence quenching; molecular docking

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21167013, 31060210]
  2. Program of Jiangxi Provincial Department of Science and Technology [20112BBF60010]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology of Nanchang University [SKLF-ZZB-201305, SKLF-ZZA-201302, SKLF-KF-201203]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) is widely used as a plasticizer in industrial production, but may have a potential health risk. In this study, the binding characteristics of DEHP with human serum albumin (HSA) in aqueous solution at pH7.4 were determined using UV/vis absorption, fluorescence, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and circular dichroism (CD), along with a molecular simulation technique. Analysis of the fluorescence titration data at different temperatures suggested that the fluorescence quenching mechanism of HSA by DEHP was static. The calculated thermodynamic parameters indicated that hydrophobic forces played a predominant role in formation of the DEHP-HSA complex, but hydrogen bonds could not be omitted. Site marker competitive experiments and denaturation studies showed that the binding of DEHP to HSA primarily took place in subdomain IIA of HSA, and molecular docking results further corroborated the binding sites. The synchronous fluorescence, UV/vis absorption, FTIR and CD spectra revealed that the addition of DEHP induced changes in the secondary structure of HSA. Protein surface hydrophobicity (PSH) tests indicated that DEHP binding to HSA caused an increase in the PSH. Moreover, the effects of some metal ions on the binding constant of DEHP-HSA interaction were also investigated. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据