4.4 Article

Study of porcine adiponectin (ADIPOQ) gene and association of a missense mutation with EBVs for production and carcass traits in Italian Duroc heavy pigs

期刊

LIVESTOCK SCIENCE
卷 125, 期 1, 页码 101-104

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.03.003

关键词

Adiponectin gene; Pig breeds; SNPs; Genotyping; Association analysis

资金

  1. Italian MIUR (PRIN 2006)
  2. Italian MiPAF SelMol

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The adiponectin (adiponectin, Cl Q and collagen domain containing) encoded by ADIPOQ is an adipokine that modulates several biological processes such as lipogenesis, gluconeogenesis, fatty acid oxidation, glucose uptake and insulin sensitivity. An objective of this study was to identify SNPs; in the ADIPOQ gene both in cosmopolitan and local pig breeds reared in Italy and in Meishan samples. Resequencing of ADIPOQ gene regions in 16 pigs of 12 breeds revealed only two SNPs (EU489740:g.1611G>A synonymous and EU489740:g.1735G>A missense mutations) already reported. The g.1735G>A polymorphism was genotyped by PCR-RFLP in 510 pigs from 11 breeds reared in Italy (Italian Large White, Italian Duroc, Italian Landrace, Belgian Landrace, Hampshire, Pietrain, Calabrese, Casertana, Cinta Senese, Mora Romagnola and Nero Siciliano) and from Chinese Meishan breed. The Italian local breeds were homozygous for the g.1735G allele while the Meishan samples resulted homozygous for the g.1735A allele. The polymorphism segregates in the cosmopolitan breeds, except for Hampshire, and the rarer g.1735A allele showed the highest frequency in Italian Duroc (0.12). Association analysis of g.1735G>A polymorph ism with estimated breeding values (EBVs) for average daily gain (ADG), feed:gain ratio (FGR), weight of neck and loin (lean cuts, LC), weight of ham (H) and backfat thickness (BFT) were performed in Italian Duroc heavy pigs. The GA vs GG pigs showed higher least square means for ADG (P = 0.003) and LC (P = 0.036) EBVs and lower value for FGR EBV (P = 0.033). (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据