4.7 Article

A comprehensive hepatitis C virus risk factors meta-analysis (1989-2013); Do they differ in Egypt?

期刊

LIVER INTERNATIONAL
卷 35, 期 2, 页码 489-501

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/liv.12617

关键词

Egypt and meta-analysis; HCV; risk factors

资金

  1. Science and Technology Development Fund (STDF), Egypt [3469]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & AimsThe prevention and control of HCV infection is complex and challenging in terms of describing risk factors and modes of transmission. This meta-analysis was conducted to summarize the best available data on HCV risk factors worldwide and in Egypt. MethodsThrough exhaustive literature searches (1989-2013) of HCV risk factors, 357 original eligible articles were included in this study. ResultsThe highest detected risk was intravenous drug users (IDUs) (OR=9.6) followed by HIV infection (OR=4.9), having an IDU partner (OR=4.1), HBV infection (OR=3.5), Caesarean section (CS) (OR=3.35), blood transfusion (OR=3.2) and having an HCV+ partner (OR=3). Organ transplantation, hospital admission, haemodialysis and having a sexually transmitted infection carry 2.96, 2.4, 2.18 and 2 risks of having HCV respectively. Other significant risk factors included poor education, older age, sharing sharp or blunt objects, MSM, tattooing, hijama, body piercing, minor operations and medical procedures. Some risks showed a decrease over the previous decade, including blood transfusion, organ transplantation, IDUs, IDU partner and CS. Others showed rising risks, including having an HCV+ partner, MSM and suffering from STI. In Egypt, male gender, rural residence, acupuncture and receiving parenteral antischistosomal treatment were significant risks, while neither HIV nor HBV were found to carry a risk of HCV infection. ConclusionBlood transfusion, organ transplantation, CS, IDUs, haemodialysis, minor operations and medical procedures are established risk factors. Attention and urgent intervention should be given to the sexual route of transmission, as well as that through minor operations and medical procedures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据