4.7 Article

n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids worsen inflammation and fibrosis in experimental nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

期刊

LIVER INTERNATIONAL
卷 34, 期 6, 页码 918-930

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/liv.12500

关键词

-

资金

  1. MIUR (Progetti PRIN)
  2. European Community [HEALTH-F2-2009-241762]
  3. Fondazione CARIPLO

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & Aims: n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) ameliorate fatty liver in experimental models, but their effects on inflammation and fibrosis during steatohepatitis are either controversial or lacking. We compared the effects of supplementation with olive oil (OO) alone or OO and n-3 PUFA on the development and progression of experimental steatohepatitis. Methods: Balb/C mice (>= 5 mice/group) were fed a methionine-and choline-deficient (MCD) diet or a control diet for 4 or 8 weeks. At the same time, mice were supplemented with n-3 PUFA (eicosapentaenoic and docosahexahenoic acid, 25 mg together with 75 mg OO), or OO alone (100 mg), two times a week by intragastric gavage. Results: After 8 weeks, mice on MCD/n-3 had higher ALT levels compared to MCD/OO and more severe scores of inflammation, including a significant increase in the number of lipogranulomas (26.4 +/- 8.4 vs. 5.1 +/- 5 per field, P < 0.001). Intrahepatic expression of TNF-alpha and CCL2 was higher in MCD/n-3 mice at both time points. In addition, increased expression of the profibrogenic genes TIMP-1 and TGF-beta, and more severe histological scores of fibrosis were evident in MCD/n-3 mice. After 8 week of MCD diet, portal pressure was higher in mice receiving n-3 than in those on OO alone (5.1 +/- 1.4 vs. 7.0 +/- 0.9 mmHg, P < 0.05). Analysis of hepatic fatty acid profile showed that supplementation resulted in effective incorporation of n-3 PUFA. Conclusions: In a murine model of steatohepatitis, supplementation with n-3 PUFA and OO is associated with more severe necro-inflammation and fibrosis than in mice treated with OO only.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据