4.7 Article

Long-term outcome in Caucasian patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection after HBsAg seroclearance

期刊

LIVER INTERNATIONAL
卷 35, 期 1, 页码 140-147

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/liv.12461

关键词

antiviral therapy; chronic hepatitis B complications; hepatitis B reactivation; hepatitis B resolved infection; hepatocellular carcinoma; cirrhosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & AimsThe natural course after hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance in Caucasian patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is not well-defined. To investigate the clinical characteristics and outcome in a series of European Caucasian patients with chronic HBV infection according to HBsAg response over time. MethodsA total of 612 patients with compensated chronic HBV infection and without other cause of liver disease were prospectively followed up. Seventy-eight subjects cleared HBsAg and 534 remained HBsAg-positive. Clinical and virological examinations were periodically performed and development of cirrhosis and liver-related complications was monitored during a mean follow-up time of 9.9years. ResultsAfter HBsAg seroclearance, serum HBV DNA was undetectable in 38 patients in whom it was tested and HBsAg reappearance was observed in two subjects (2.6%). At 15years of follow-up, the cumulative probability of developing a liver-related complication was 11.6% in HBsAg-positive patients and 1.8% in those with HBsAg loss (P=0.03), although this benefit was limited to patients with cirrhosis (P<0.001) and to those who received therapy (P<0.01). Among patients without cirrhosis and among those who did not receive therapy, the probability was not different between those who cleared the HBsAg and those who did not (P=0.3 and P=0.5 respectively). ConclusionHepatitis B surface antigen loss confers a significant clinical benefit in Caucasian subjects with HBV-related cirrhosis and in those with chronic HBV infection who receive antiviral therapy. However, HBsAg reappearance can be observed in selected cases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据