4.7 Article

Infiltrating neutrophils aggravate metabolic liver failure in fah-deficient mice

期刊

LIVER INTERNATIONAL
卷 35, 期 3, 页码 774-785

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/liv.12594

关键词

CCR2; fah-deficient mice; immune injury; liver failure; neutrophils

资金

  1. Ministry of Science & Technology of China [2013CB944902]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [31390433, 91029303]
  3. National Science & Technology Major Projects [2012ZX10002006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & AimsMice deficient in tyrosine catabolic enzyme fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase (fah(-/-)) was a useful animal model for studying liver failure. Tyrosine metabolic toxicants accumulate in hepatocytes over time in fah(-/-) mice, leading to hepatocyte necrosis which we propose release many type of damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and cause chronic inflammation. However, whether immune-mediated inflammations cause a second wave of liver damage in fah(-/-) mice have never been investigated. MethodsThe progressive changes in body weight, survival rate and liver inflammation were examined after the protective drug (NTBC) withdrawal. Cell depletion and receptor blocking were used to define the key immune cells and molecules in liver injury. ResultsAfter removing of NTBC, fah(-/-) mice lost their body weight gradually, and finally died when the body weight largely reduced (low to 70%), along with increased serum ALT and total bilirubin. Importantly, a large amount of liver-infiltrating neutrophils were observed. Neutrophils depletion reduced the liver failure, and resulted in a better survival of fah(-/-) mice after NTBC withdrawal. The liver tissues produce more CCR2 chemokine, with neutrophils expressing more CCR2. CCR2 inhibition reduced the number of liver-infiltrating neutrophils and increased the expression of repair cytokine IL-22, with a longer survival of fah(-/-) mice after NTBC withdrawal. ConclusionsThe excess infiltrating neutrophils exacerbate liver failure in fah(-/-) mice which can be attenuated by blocking CCR2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据