4.7 Article

Clinical features associated with radiological response to sorafenib in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a large multicenter study in Japan

期刊

LIVER INTERNATIONAL
卷 35, 期 5, 页码 1581-1589

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/liv.12591

关键词

hepatocellular carcinoma; predictive factors; response; sorafenib; survival

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & AimsThere have been no established predictive factors of responders to sorafenib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to investigate the factors predicting a good response to sorafenib in Japanese patients with HCC. MethodsA total of 465 patients with unresectable HCC in the Japanese Red Cross Liver Study Group were treated with sorafenib between January 2008 and August 2013, and 316 patients with sufficient clinical data were analysed. To determine the factors predicting a good response, the relationships between radiological response and the following clinicopathological factors were analysed: age, gender, performance status, liver function, tumour status and decrease in serum alpha-foetoprotein (AFP) level after 1month. ResultsThis study included 259 males and 57 females with a median age of 70years (range, 37-90years), of which 191 (60.4%) were classified as Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C, and 271 (85.8%) had Child-Pugh class A liver function. The median overall survival time was 307days and progression-free survival time was 109days. According to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours, four patients achieved a complete response, 51 achieved a partial response, 136 had stable disease and 125 had progressive disease. Multivariate analysis identified female gender (P=0.003) and decreased serum AFP level after 1month (P=0.042) as independent predictors of a complete or partial response. ConclusionOur results suggest female gender and a decrease in serum AFP level are independent predictors of good response to sorafenib.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据