4.7 Article

Different changes in mitochondrial apoptotic pathway in lymphocytes and granulocytes in cirrhotic patients with sepsis

期刊

LIVER INTERNATIONAL
卷 33, 期 6, 页码 834-842

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/liv.12169

关键词

apoptosis; bacterial infections; cirrhosis; leucocytes; microRNAs

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of University, Progetti di Interesse Nazionale (PRIN)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & Aims Apoptosis regulates leucocyte response during bacterial infections. This study explored leucocyte apoptotic pathway in cirrhotic patients with or without infections or sepsis. Methods In cirrhotic patients with bacterial infection or sepsis, the expression of Caspase 9, Bcl-2 family proteins, which comprises pro-apoptotic molecules, such as Bax, and anti-apoptotic molecules, such as Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL, were measured in peripheral lymphocytes and granulocytes. Regulatory microRNAs MIR-15 and MIR-16 were also measured. Results This study enrolled 80 patients with cirrhosis, of whom 28 had no evidence of infections, 32 had bacterial infections and 20 had sepsis; reference values were obtained from 10 age-matched healthy subjects. An over-expression of Caspase-9 and pro-apoptotic protein Bax was found in lymphocytes of cirrhotic patients with infection or sepsis as compared with non-infected cases (P=0.05 and 0.0001, respectively), while anti-apoptotic proteins Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL were downregulated. In granulocytes, lowest expression of pro-apoptotic protein Bax occurred in septic patients, while in cirrhotics with infections anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL were upregulated. Eight patients died; the survivors had less derangements in Bax, Bcl-2 and BcL-xL expression than non-survivors. The pro-apoptotic miRNA, MIR-15 and MIR-16, were upregulated in cirrhotics with bacterial infections. Conclusions Overall, the data show in lymphocytes, and not in granulocytes, an activation of the pro-apoptotic pathway in cirrhotic patients with bacterial infections, which correlates with the severity of the infection and the outcome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据