4.7 Article

Adefovir dipivoxil is effective for the treatment of cirrhotic patients with lamivudine failure

期刊

LIVER INTERNATIONAL
卷 29, 期 3, 页码 420-426

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2008.01867.x

关键词

adefovir dipivoxil; chronic hepatitis B; cirrhosis; elderly; lamivudine failure

资金

  1. European Community [ViRgil LSHM-CT-2004-503359]
  2. Gilead Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Data on the efficacy of adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) in elderly and cirrhotic patients with lamivudine-resistant (LAM-R) chronic hepatitis B are scarce. This retrospective cohort study evaluated the safety and efficacy of ADV in this specific patient population. Sixty-eight cirrhotic LAM-R patients, of whom 19 (27.9%) were elderly (>= 65 years of age) and nine had severe disease (two post-orthotopic liver transplantation, four pre-orthotopic liver transplantation and three decompensated), with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection received ADV. Virological and biochemical responses to the addition of ADV were analysed. At inclusion, all patients were receiving LAM; ADV was added. 75.4% of patients received a combination of LAM and ADV throughout this study for a median treatment duration of 12.6 months; the remainder received ADV with an overlap with LAM treatment for a median duration of 7.9 months. At the end of follow-up, 41.2% of patients had undetectable HBV DNA (<= 2000 copies/ml) with a median reduction of 3.4 log(10) copies/ml. Time to reach undetectable HBV DNA was dependent on baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels and HBeAg status. Normalization of serum ALT levels was observed in 55.2% (32/58) of patients. In patients who were HBeAg positive at baseline, HBeAg loss and seroconversion occurred in 23% (9/39) and 10% (4/39) respectively. No resistance mutations and no significant side effects were observed during the study period. Adefovir dipivoxil provides effective and safe treatment in cirrhotic and elderly patients who failed LAM therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据