4.6 Article

Neoproterozoic tectonothermal evolution of NW India: Evidence from geochemistry and geochronology of granitoids

期刊

LITHOS
卷 316, 期 -, 页码 330-346

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2018.07.020

关键词

Granitoid; Petrogenesis; Neoproterozoic; NW India; Rodinia

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [41573020, 41773027]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neoproterozoic granitoids from the Delhi Fold Belt in NW India record formation and evolution of the marginal orogen in the Rodinia supercontinent. The ca. 976 Ma Moras I-type granites show variable SiO2 (67.15-75.87 wt %) and CaO (1.10-324 wt%) and low REE (59-196 ppm). Their spider diagram is characterized by enrichment of Rb, Th and U and depletion of Na and Ta with positive Pb and negative Sr and Ti anomalies. They have positive epsilon(Nd(t)) (+0.41 to +1.40) and epsilon(Hf) (+2.34 to +935) and moderate delta O-18 values (6.48%. to 7.58%.). These features suggest that the Moras granites were produced by melting of the juvenile mafic curst. However, the ca. 811 Ma Pali and ca. 780 Ma Mirpur A-type granites have high SiO2 (74.42-78.63 wt%), K2O + Na2O (7.74-8.95 wt%) and REE (266-334 ppm). Their spider diagrams are more enriched in Rb, Th and U and depleted in Ba, Sr and Ti. They have lower epsilon(Nd) ( - 2.28 to +0.84) and epsilon(Hf) values (-231 to +8.62) than, but similar delta O-18 (5.77%. to 7.01 parts per thousand) to those of the Moras granites, suggesting that the A-type granites were partial melts of the dehydrated mafic crust in a rift setting. The I- and A-type granites in NW India resulted from physicochemical variations of the lithosphere during evolution of the Rodinia. The Neoproterozoic igneous and sedimentary rocks from the Delhi Fold Belt are well correlated with those from the Jiangnan Fold Belt in South China, suggesting that the two belts probably collected together in the configuration of the Rodinia supercontinent. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据