4.6 Article

Ca. 1.5 Ga mafic magmatism in South China during the break-up of the supercontinent Nuna/Columbia: The Zhuqing Fe-Ti-V oxide ore-bearing mafic intrusions in western Yangtze Block

期刊

LITHOS
卷 168, 期 -, 页码 85-98

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2013.02.004

关键词

Mesoproterozoic; Mafic intrusion; Zircon and baddeleyite geochronology; Yangtze Block; Supercontinent Nuna/Columbia; Fe-Ti-V oxide ore

资金

  1. 973 Program [2009CB421003]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZCX-YW-136-1]
  3. NSFC [41273049, 41073043, 40903022]
  4. SKLOG, IGCAS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Secondary ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS) zircon and baddeleyite U-Pb ages, elemental, and Nd isotopic data are reported for the Zhuqing Fe-Ti-V oxide ore-bearing mafic intrusions in western Yangtze Block, South China. The mafic intrusions are dated at 1494 +/- 6 Ma (zircon U-Pb), 1486 +/- 3 Ma (baddeleyite U-Pb) and 1490 +/- 4 Ma (baddeleyite U-Pb). The intrusions are dominantly gabbros that experienced variable degrees of alteration. All the studied rocks are high-Ti and alkaline in composition, and exhibit light rare earth element enrichment and humped incompatible trace-element patterns with no obvious Nb-Ta depletion, similar to intraplate alkali basaltic rocks in continental flood basalt (CFB) and ocean island basalt (OIB) provinces. Negative epsilon(Nd)(T) values (-0.97 to -3.58) and fractionation of the HREE of these rocks indicate that they were derived from a time-integrated, slightly enriched asthenospheric mantle source with minor crustal contamination. Like other Fe-Ti oxide mineralized rocks in plume-related layered intrusions or large igneous provinces around the world, the Zhuqing gabbros likely occurred in an intraplate setting. The similar to 1.5 Ga mafic magmatism was likely part of the global 1.6-1.2 Ga anorogenic magmatism related to the break-up of the supercontinent Nuna/Columbia, suggesting that the Yangtze Block may have been a component of the supercontinent. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据