4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Metasomatic origin of diamonds in the world's largest diamondiferous eclogite

期刊

LITHOS
卷 112, 期 -, 页码 1014-1024

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2009.06.036

关键词

Eclogite xenolith; Diamond; Metasomatic origin; Carbon isotopes; SIMS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The world's largest diamondiferous eclogite (8.8 kg, UD-111/02) from the Udachnaya kimberlite, Siberia, is the subject of this investigation. High-resolution X-ray computed tomography (HRXCT), chemistry of host minerals and diamond inclusions, stratigraphy of the diamonds (cathodoluminescence zoning), and carbon isotopes have been obtained. HRXCT images, 3-d models, and subsequent detailed dissection of this Group B eclogite revealed linear distributions of diamonds along alteration zones. Both unusual multiple-diamond clusters with dodecahedral morphologies, and distinctive internal zoning recorded by cathodoluminescence analyses are indicative of multiple stages of diamond growth and resorption in UD-111-02. Carbon-isotope ratios (delta C-13) of 16 diamonds have a total range of similar to 7 parts per thousand (-2.0 to -9.2 parts per thousand), with the majority at -5.4 parts per thousand. Diamond core values are variable and include the lightest (-9.2 parts per thousand) and heaviest delta C-13 (-2.0 parts per thousand) values, suggesting that cores formed from distinct carbon sources, or grew under different conditions. In contrast, the rims of all diamonds have similar delta C-13 values (average -5.2 parts per thousand with a 2SD of 1.2 parts per thousand), suggesting that they formed under uniform conditions. Mineral inclusions in diamonds display compositional variations. These lines of evidence, considered together, indicate that diamonds in this eclogite were formed by several events, most likely from multiple metasomatic fluids. Furthermore, it is becoming increasingly evident that in most diamondiferous eclogites, diamonds are not synchronously formed with their host eclogites. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据