4.3 Article

A continuous flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry method for high precision determination of dissolved gas ratios and isotopic composition

期刊

LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY-METHODS
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 323-337

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.4319/lom.2014.12.323

关键词

-

资金

  1. Thailand's Ministry of Science and Technology
  2. University of Massachusetts Dartmouth
  3. NSF [OCE-0623199, OCE-0851092, OCE-1130495]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dissolved gas ratios and isotopic compositions provide essential information about the biological and physical mechanisms influencing N-2, O-2, and Ar in aquatic systems. Current methods available are either limited by overall cost, labor-intensive sample collection and analysis, or insufficient precision. Here, we present a new highly accurate and robust method for sample collection and subsequent simultaneous measurement of the dissolved gas ratios (N-2/Ar and O-2/Ar) and isotopic compositions (delta N-15(2) and delta O-18(2)) in seawater. The relatively simple sampling procedure using low cost materials enables collection of hundreds to more than a thousand discrete samples on a single research cruise. Samples can be preserved and stored at room temperature and maintain their integrity for many months. Laboratory analysis employs an on-line extraction system coupled to a multi-collector isotope ratio mass spectrometer (IRMS). A continuous flow of He carrier gas completely degasses the sample, and passes through the preparation and purification system before entering the IRMS for analysis. The use of this continuous He carrier permits short analysis times (less than 8 min per sample) as compared with current high-precision methods. In addition to reference gases, calibration is achieved using air-equilibrated water standards of known temperature and salinity. Assessment of reference gas injections, air equilibrated standards, as well as samples collected in the field shows the accuracy and precision of this new method to be equal to or better than current standard techniques.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据