4.3 Article

An automated system for spectrophotometric seawater pH measurements

期刊

LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY-METHODS
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 16-27

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.4319/lom.2013.11.16

关键词

-

资金

  1. US National Science Foundation [OCE 07529172]
  2. Los Angeles chapter of the ARCS Foundation
  3. Directorate For Geosciences
  4. Office of Polar Programs (OPP) [1040957] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  6. Directorate For Geosciences [752972, 0961242] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spectrophotometric pH measurements stand to benefit greatly from the consistency and speed made possible through automation. Here we describe a simple, fast, and precise automated spectrophotometric pH measurement system for seawater samples. The system requires 4 min per analysis, consumes 60 mL seawater from a sample bottle, and requires little operator interaction to obtain repeatability comparable with the best results published with other techniques (+/- 0.0004). The system and the suggested sample handling methods are assessed using over 5000 at-sea measurements obtained during a hydrographic cruise in the Indian Ocean. We estimate the overall measurement uncertainty of the existing, pre-2011, body of at-sea spectrophotometric pH measurements-made using these methods or otherwise-to currently be in the range of 0.01 to 0.02 pH units. However, a new approach for using purified dyes at a range of temperatures and salinities (Liu et al. 2011) stands to greatly reduce this uncertainty for future spectrophotometric pH measurements: our assessment suggests that the overall uncertainty should improve to similar to 0.005 pH units if dye impurities and the indicator's temperature and salinity sensitivity are adequately addressed. Any such improvement in measurement accuracy may provide a basis from which to determine adjustments appropriate for the existing body of spectrophotometric pH measurements made using commercially available (and impure) dyes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据