4.7 Article

Responses to iron limitation in two colonies of Stylophora pistillata exposed to high temperature: Implications for coral bleaching

期刊

LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY
卷 56, 期 3, 页码 813-828

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.4319/lo.2011.56.3.0813

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [0648478]
  2. AIMS
  3. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  4. Directorate For Geosciences [0648478] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exposing the coral Stylophora pistillata to seawater depleted in available iron by complexation with the strong chelator desferrioxamine B reduces the photosynthetic efficiency and alters the pigment composition in its symbiotic algae at high temperatures. Similar effects of iron limitation are known for free-living algae, but this is the first demonstration of low-iron stress in a dinoflagellate living endosymbiotically. Maintaining corals at elevated temperature (30 degrees C and 31 degrees C) under diminished iron availability leads to reduced maximum quantum yields (F-v:F-m) of photosystem II (PSII), specifically on brightly illuminated surfaces of the coral. This reduction in maximum quantum yield is due in part to increased photoprotection, indicated by an increase in the photoprotective xanthophyll diatoxanthin, which promotes nonphotochemical quenching of excess light energy to restrict oxidative damage under conditions that impair photosynthetic electron transfer. However, photo-physiological changes associated with the lowered maximum quantum yield did not prevent photodamage to PSII under the combined effects of elevated temperature and low iron availability, as shown by the decrease in maximum (F-m) that was not accompanied by significant change in the minimum (F-o) fluorescence yield. All of the foregoing is consistent with the potential of iron limitation to contribute to the underlying conditions by which thermal stress evokes the physiological response by corals that culminates in the symbiotic dysfunction of natural bleaching.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据