4.7 Article

Long-term N-15-nitrogen retention in tidal freshwater marsh sediment: Elucidating the microbial contribution

期刊

LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY
卷 54, 期 1, 页码 13-22

出版社

AMER SOC LIMNOLOGY OCEANOGRAPHY
DOI: 10.4319/lo.2009.54.1.0013

关键词

-

资金

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research
  2. Dutch-Flemish cooperation on Coastal Research (VLANEZO)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The long-term retention of nitrogen in sediment of a tidal freshwater marsh in the Scheldt estuary (Belgium) was investigated by an in situ N-15-labeling experiment. Sediment of an unvegetated creek bank and sediment vegetated by common reed (Phragmites australis) were labeled with N-15-enriched NH4+ after which N-15 was traced into pore-water dissolved NH4+, NO3-, and N-2; plant roots and leaves; and bulk sediment over a 1-yr period. Label retention in the sediment organic matter was further characterized by analyzing KCl-extracted sediment and hydrolyzable amino acids (including the bacterial biomarker D-alanine). Within weeks all added (NH4+)-N-15 was transformed and/or assimilated by the biota. Between 42% and 48% of the added label was recovered in plants, root, and sediment (collectively) after 3-6 months, whereas 24% remained after 1 yr. Transfer to plants and roots was rapid and although retention in leaves was transient, the N-15 assimilated by roots was retained for the entire 1-yr period. Root assimilation could account for 12-23% of the N-15 retained in vegetated plots. The majority of N-15 was retained in the organic matter pool within the sediment (represented by N-15 in the KCl extracted sediment and total hydrolyzable amino acids), primarily through efficient recycling of the N-15 within the microbial community. N-15 incorporation into D-alanine confirmed that bacteria were the major group of microorganisms responsible for the strong retention of N-15. This study shows the strong potential of reed roots and especially bacteria to retain nitrogen in tidal freshwater sediment over longer periods of time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据