4.7 Article

High-glucose condition reduces cardioprotective effects of insulin against mechanical stress-induced cell injury

期刊

LIFE SCIENCES
卷 87, 期 5-6, 页码 154-161

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2010.06.006

关键词

Hyperglycemia; Insulin; Mechanical stretch; Cardiomyocyte; Apoptosis; Cardioprotection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: Mechanical stress induces cardiomyocyte injury and contributes to the progression of heart failure in patients with hypertension. In this study, we investigated whether insulin exerts cardioprotective effects against mechanical stretching-induced cell injury, and whether the protective effect is influenced by high-glucose condition. Main methods: Cultured neonatal rat cardiomyocytes were plated on silicone chambers, and the cells were mechanically stretched by 15% to induce cell injury. Key findings: Mechanical stretching increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) and decreased mitochondrial inner membrane potential (Delta Psi(m)), eventually leading to cell death by apoptosis and necrosis. Insulin activated the phosphoinositide 3 (PI3) kinase/Akt pathway and reduced apoptosis and necrosis by suppressing ROS increase and preserving Delta Psi(m). However, high-glucose condition attenuated the insulin-induced Akt phosphorylation and cardioprotection. To investigate the mechanisms that attenuated the effects of insulin in high-glucose condition, we examined the expression of tensin homologue deleted on chromosome 10 (PTEN), which is a negative regulator of the PI3 kinase/Akt pathway. The expressions of PTEN and phosphorylated PTEN were significantly decreased by insulin, and those effects were attenuated in high-glucose condition. Significance: The present results suggest that insulin prevents mechanical stress-induced cell injury which otherwise lead to heart failure. Furthermore, we found that high-glucose condition prevented the decrease in PTEN expression and the cardioprotective effects induced by insulin. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据