4.7 Article

Effects of cannabinoids on capsaicin receptor activity following exposure of primary sensory neurons to inflammatory mediators

期刊

LIFE SCIENCES
卷 87, 期 5-6, 页码 162-168

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2010.06.003

关键词

Transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1; ion channel; TRPV1; CB1; Non-CB1/non-CB2; Pain; Nociception

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: Activation of the cannabinoid 1 (CB1) receptor in cultured primary sensory neurons reduces responses mediated through the transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 receptor (TRPV1), which plays a pivotal role in the development of heat hyperalgesia and visceral hyper-reflexia in inflammatory conditions. Here, we studied the effect of cannabinoid-evoked inhibitory effect on TRPV1 in inflammatory conditions. Main methods: The effect of anandamide (1 nM-30 nM) and 1,1-dimethylhepty1-11-hydroxytetrahydrocannabinol (HU210: 1 mu M-10 mu M) was assessed on capsaicin (10 nM or 100 nM)-evoked cobalt uptake in rat cultured primary sensory neurons following the incubation of the cells in an inflammatory environment created by the major inflammatory mediators, bradykinin (5 mu M), prostaglandin E-2 (5 mu M) and nerve growth factor (100 ng/ml) for 10 min. Key findings: 1 nM and 10 nM anandamide significantly reduced the 10 nM but not the 100 nM capsaicin-evoked responses. HU210 did not produce a significant change in responses evoked by capsaicin at either of its concentrations. The anandamide-induced inhibitory effect could not be reversed by the CBI receptor antagonist, rimonabant (200 nM) or the membrane-permeable cAMP analogue, 8Br-cAMP (100 mu M). Significance: These findings suggest that anandamide may inhibit TRPV1-mediated responses in a non-CB1/non-cannabinoid 2 receptor-dependent manner in primary sensory neurons in inflammatory conditions. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据