4.7 Article

Mesenchymal stem cell administration at coronary artery reperfusion in the rat by two delivery routes: A quantitative assessment

期刊

LIFE SCIENCES
卷 83, 期 13-14, 页码 511-515

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2008.07.020

关键词

cell therapy; infarction; reperfusion; rat mesenchymal stem cell; stem cell administration; nanoparticle; neutron activation

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [NIH-RO1-HL073709]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: Ideally, mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) home to and/or remain at the site of damaged myocardium when administered after myocardial infarction. However, MSC may not remain in the heart, but instead relocate to other areas. We investigated quantitatively the distribution of labeled rat MSC, given by two routes after coronary artery occlusion/reperfusion in rats. Main methods: Rats were subjected to 45 min of coronary artery occlusion and 7 days of reperfusion. Before reperfusion rats received 2 x 10(6) MSC, labeled with europium, injected directly into the ischemic region of the heart (n = 9) or intravenously (n = 8). After 1 week tissues were analyzed for label content together with a standard curve of known quantities of labeled MSC. Key findings: In rats receiving cells injected directly into the myocardium, 15% of labeled cells were retained in the heart. When the cells were administered intravenously, no MSC were detected in the heart. The route of administration did not affect distribution to other organs, as the number of MSC in liver, spleen and lung was similar with both routes of delivery. Significance: Even with direct intramyocardial injection, only a small proportion of the cells are retained in the heart, instead traveling to other organs. With intravenous injection there was no evidence that cells homed to the damaged heart. Although cell delivery to the heart was significantly affected by the route of administration, the distribution,of cells to other organs was similar with both routes of administration. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据