4.4 Article

Distinct DNA Damage Spectra Induced by Ionizing Radiation in Normoxic and Hypoxic Cells

期刊

RADIATION RESEARCH
卷 184, 期 4, 页码 442-448

出版社

RADIATION RESEARCH SOC
DOI: 10.1667/RR14117.1

关键词

-

资金

  1. Environment Research and Technology Development Fund of the Ministry of the Environment, Japan [RF-1005, C-0801]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25281021, 26116518] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ionizing radiation induces more cell death under normoxic conditions than under hypoxic conditions. This phenomenon, which is known as the oxygen enhancement effect, occurs primarily because ionizing radiation causes more DNA lesions in the presence of oxygen than in its absence. However, the roles these lesions play in terms of cell survival and chromosome damage have not been fully characterized. We exposed a panel of chicken DT40 mutant cells to ionizing radiation to categorize the type of lesion induced and the DNA-repair pathway involved under both normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Among the mutant panel, RAD54(-/-)/KU70(-/-) cells exhibited the greatest radiosensitivity, which was found to be significantly higher under normoxic conditions. This indicates that double-strand breaks (DSBs) were the major cause of cell death and that ionizing radiation induces more DSBs under normoxic condition. Interestingly, the sensitivity of the REV3(-/-) cells increased under hypoxic conditions. Indeed, the REV3(-/-) mutant exhibited a greater number of chromosomal aberrations under hypoxic conditions than under normoxic conditions. These results suggest that the Rev3-mediated translesion-synthesis pathway is more critical for cellular tolerance to ionizing radiation in hypoxic cells than in normoxic cells, and that more chemically modified DNA might be induced under hypoxic conditions. In this study, we identify a previously unappreciated radiation-induced pattern of DNA damage under hypoxic conditions. (C) 2015 by Radiation Research Society

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据