4.3 Article

Molecular characterization of neoplastic and normal sister lymphoblastoid B-cell lines from chronic lymphocytic leukemia

期刊

LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA
卷 54, 期 8, 页码 1769-1779

出版社

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2013.764418

关键词

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL); lymphoblastoid cell line (LCL); IGHV sequence; cell-of-origin; natural antibodies; antigen structure; CD5+innate B-cells

资金

  1. Swedish East Gothia Cancer Foundation, Linkoping University Hospital Funds
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [HE3553/2-1]
  3. Deutsche Krebshilfe Max-Eder program
  4. CLLGRF
  5. BMBF (Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany) [01 KI 0771]
  6. Swedish Cancer Society
  7. Swedish Research Council, GSD

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) B-cells resemble self-renewing CD5 + B-cells carrying auto/xeno-antigen-reactive B-cell receptors (BCRs) and multiple innate pattern-recognition receptors, such as Toll-like receptors and scavenger receptors. Integration of signals from BCRs with multiple surface membrane receptors determines whether the cells will be proliferating, anergic or apoptotic. To better understand the role of antigen in leukemogenesis, CLL cell lines producing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) will facilitate structural analysis of antigens and supply DNA for genetic studies. We present here a comprehensive genotypic and phenotypic characterization of available CLL and normal B-cell-derived lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) from the same individuals (n = 17). Authenticity and verification studies of CLL-patient origin were done by IGHV sequencing, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and DNA/short tandem repeat (STR) fingerprinting. Innate B-cell features, i.e. natural Ab production and CD5 receptors, were present in most CLL cell lines, but in none of the normal LCLs. This panel of immortalized CLL-derived cell lines is a valuable reference representing a renewable source of authentic Abs and DNA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据