4.3 Article

Lack of prognostic value of MMP-9 expression and immunohistochemically defined germinal center phenotype in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with modern chemotherapy with or without CD20 antibody

期刊

LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA
卷 50, 期 8, 页码 1301-1307

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10428190903003244

关键词

Lymphoma; MMP-9; MMP-2; TIMP-1; GC phenotype; prognosis

资金

  1. Pharmacy Foundation of Oulu University
  2. Vanska Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCLs) are a heterogeneous group of lymphomas, with no accepted biological prognostic markers in routine clinical practice. Previously, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP-9), tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinase (TIMP)-1 and non-germinal center (GC) phenotype have been shown to associate with poor prognosis in DLBCL patients. The aim of this study was to find out whether tissue expression of gelatinases (MMP-2 and MMP-9) or their tissue inhibitors (TIMP-1 and TIMP-2) or immunohistochemically defined GC phenotype could act as prognostic markers in patients treated with modern treatments. Additionally, correlations between these proteins and GC phenotype were investigated. GC phenotype and tissue expression of MMP-2, MMP-9, TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 were analyzed by immunohistochemistry in tissue samples from 114 DLBCL patients. In this study, in patients treated with modern lymphoma treatments (5-year cause-specific survival 69.8%) MMP-2, MMP-9, TIMP-1 or TIMP-2 expression or GC phenotype did not correlate with survival. International Prognostic Index (IPI) and stage were the only factors, which retained their prognostic significance in this patient material. Gelatinases or TIMPs did not correlate with GC phenotype, either. Prognostic markers are dependent on the lymphoma treatments used. In DLBCL patients treated with modern chemotherapy with or without rituximab, MMP-9, TIMP-1 and GC phenotype seem to have lost their prognostic value.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据