4.3 Article

Effect of remission status and induction chemotherapy regimen on outcome of autologous stem cell transplantation for mantle cell lymphoma

期刊

LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA
卷 49, 期 6, 页码 1062-1073

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10428190801923725

关键词

mantle cell lymphoma; autologous stem cell transplantation; HyperCVAD; CHOP; non-Hodgkin lymphoma

资金

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [K23CA085479, P01CA044991] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NCI NIH HHS [P01 CA44991, K23 CA085479-06, P01 CA044991, K23CA85479, P01 CA044991-21, K23 CA085479] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We analysed the outcomes of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) following high-dose therapy with respect to remission status at the time of transplantation and induction regimen used in 56 consecutive patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Twenty-one patients received induction chemotherapy with HyperCVAD with or without rituximab (+/- R) followed by ASCT in first complete or partial remission (CR1/PR1), 15 received CHOP (+/- R) followed by ASCT in CR1/PR1 and 20 received ASCT following disease progression. Estimates of overall and progression-free survival (PFS) at 3 years among patients transplanted in CR1/PR1 were 93% and 63% compared with 46% and 36% for patients transplanted with relapsed/refractory disease, respectively. The hazard of mortality among patients transplanted with relapsed/refractory disease was 6.09 times that of patients transplanted in CR1/PR1 (P=0.006). Patients in the CHOP (+/- R) group had a higher risk of failure for PFS compared with patients in the HyperCVAD (+/- R) group, though the difference did not reach statistical significance (hazard ratio 3.67, P=0.11). These results suggest that ASCT in CR1/PR1 leads to improved survival outcomes for patients with MCL compared to ASCT with relapsed/refractory disease, and a HyperCVAD (+/- R) induction regimen may be associated with an improved PFS among patients transplanted in CR1/PR1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据