4.7 Article

Both leukaemic and normal peripheral B lymphoid cells are highly sensitive to the selective pharmacological inhibition of prosurvival Bcl-2 with ABT-199

期刊

LEUKEMIA
卷 28, 期 6, 页码 1207-1215

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2014.1

关键词

ABT-199; ABT-737; BCL2; chronic lymphocytic leukaemia; apoptosis; lymphocyte subsets

资金

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council [461219, 461221, 1051235, 1016701]
  2. Independent Research Institutes Infrastructure [361646]
  3. Leukemia and Lymphoma Society [7417-07, 7001-13]
  4. Australian Research Council
  5. Leukaemia Foundation of Australia
  6. Cancer Council of Victoria (Fellowship)
  7. Australian Cancer Research Foundation
  8. Victorian State Government Operational Infrastructure Support (OIS) Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Overexpression of the prosurvival protein Bcl-2 marks many B-lymphoid malignancies and contributes to resistance to many commonly used chemotherapeutic agents. The first effective BH3 mimetic inhibitors of Bcl-2, ABT-737 and navitoclax, also target Bcl-xL, causing dose-limiting thrombocytopenia. This prompted the development of the Bcl-2-selective antagonist, ABT-199. Here we show that in lymphoid cells, ABT-199 specifically causes Bax/Bak-mediated apoptosis that is triggered principally by the initiator BH3-only protein Bim. As expected, malignant cells isolated from patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia are highly sensitive to ABT-199. However, we found that normal, untransformed mature B cells are also highly sensitive to ABT-199, both in vitro and in vivo. By contrast, the B-cell precursors are largely spared, as are cells of myeloid origin. These results pinpoint the probable impact of the pharmacological inhibition of Bcl-2 by ABT-199 on the normal mature haemopoietic cell lineages in patients, and have implications for monitoring during ABT-199 therapy as well as for the clinical utility of this very promising targeted agent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据