4.7 Article

Activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway by microRNA-22 results in CLL B-cell proliferation

期刊

LEUKEMIA
卷 29, 期 1, 页码 115-125

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2014.158

关键词

-

资金

  1. ANII: Fondo Clemente Estable [FCE-7273]
  2. Fondo Maria Vina [FMV-7323]
  3. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET), Argentina
  4. FOCEM (MERCOSUR Structural Convergence Fund) [COF 03/11]
  5. CYTED Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is characterized by accumulation of clonal B cells arrested in G0/G1 stages that coexist, in different proportions, with proliferative B cells. Understanding the crosstalk between the proliferative subsets and their milieu could provide clues on CLL biology. We previously identified one of these subpopulations in the peripheral blood from unmutated patients that appears to be a hallmark of a progressive disease. Aiming to characterize the molecular mechanism underlying this proliferative behavior, we performed gene expression analysis comparing the global mRNA and microRNA expression of this leukemic subpopulation, and compared it with their quiescent counterparts. Our results suggest that proliferation of this fraction depend on microRNA-22 overexpression that induces phosphatase and tensin homolog downregulation and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT pathway activation. Transfection experiments demonstrated that miR-22 overexpression in CLL B cells switches on PI3K/AKT, leading to downregulation of p27(-Kip1) and overexpression of Survivin and Ki-67 proteins. We also demonstrated that this pathway could be triggered by microenvironment signals like CD40 ligand/interleukin-4 and, more importantly, that this regulatory loop is also present in lymph nodes from progressive unmutated patients. Altogether, these results underline the key role of PI3K/AKT pathway in the generation of the CLL proliferative pool and provide additional rationale for the usage of PI3K inhibitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据