4.7 Article

Targeting the proliferative and chemoresistant compartment in chronic lymphocytic leukemia by inhibiting survivin protein

期刊

LEUKEMIA
卷 28, 期 10, 页码 1993-2004

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2014.96

关键词

-

资金

  1. Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  2. Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias [PI 11/00792]
  3. Institut de Recerca Vall d'Hebron
  4. Sociedad Espanola de Hematologia y Hemoterapia (SEHH)
  5. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (MINECO) [RYC-2012-12018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells located in proliferation centers are constantly stimulated by accessory cells, which provide them with survival and proliferative signals and mediate chemotherapy resistance. Herein, we designed an experimental strategy with the aim of mimicking the microenvironment found in the proliferative centers to specifically target actively proliferating CLL cells. For this, we co-cultured CLL cells and bone marrow stromal cells with concomitant CD40 and Toll-like receptor 9 stimulation. This co-culture system induced proliferation, cell-cycle entry and marked resistance to treatment with fludarabine and bendamustine. Proliferating CLL cells clustered together showed a typical morphology of activated B cells and expressed survivin protein, a member of the inhibitor of apoptosis family that is mainly expressed by CLL cells in the proliferation centers. With the aim of specifically targeting actively proliferating and chemoresistant CLL cells, we investigated the effects of treatment with YM155, a small-molecule survivin inhibitor. YM155 treatment suppressed the co-culture-induced survivin expression and that was sufficient to inhibit proliferation and effectively induce apoptosis particularly in the proliferative subset of CLL cells. Interestingly, sensitivity to YM155 was independent from common prognostic markers, including 17p13.1 deletion. Altogether, these findings provide a rationale for clinical development of YM155 in CLL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据