4.7 Article

The gradient crystalline structure and microhardness in the treated layer of TC17 via high energy shot peening

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 357, 期 -, 页码 197-203

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.09.013

关键词

Titanium; High energy shot peening; Nanograin; Gradient crystalline structure; Microhardness

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51475375]
  2. Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Solidification Processing in NWPU [KP201305]
  3. NWPU Innovation Fund for Science and Technology [2012KJ02002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The gradient nanocrystalline structure from the topmost surface to the matrix of a bulk coarse-grained TC17 was attained by using high energy shot peening treatment at an air pressure of 0.35 MPa and a processing duration of 30 min. The thickness from the topmost surface with a grain size of about 10.5 nm to the matrix with a micrometer structure was about 120 pin, and the thickness in the nanocrystalline layer was about 20 pin. The microscopic and nanocrystalline structure characteristic in the treated layer were investigated via X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. The nanograins layer, the nanometer-thick laminated structure layer, the refined grains layer and the low-strain matrix layer occurred in sequence from the topmost surface to the matrix, and therefore the gradient nanocrystalline structure in the treated layer was produced by using high energy shot peening. TEM investigation confirmed that the dislocation activity with very high stacking fault energy induced by surface severe plastic deformation mainly controlled the grain refinement. The microhardness (HV0.02) from the topmost surface to the matrix gradually increased by 43% from 440 to 629 and the gradient variation of the microhardness with the depths from the topmost surface to the matrix of treated TC17 was obtained. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据