4.7 Article

Toll-like receptor alterations in myelodysplastic syndrome

期刊

LEUKEMIA
卷 27, 期 9, 页码 1832-1840

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2013.180

关键词

myelodysplastic syndromes; innate immunity; Toll-like receptor; IL-8; JMJD3

资金

  1. Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) [RP100202]
  2. DOD/Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs
  3. MD Anderson Cancer Center Leukemia SPORE grant [CA100632]
  4. Evans Foundation
  5. MD Anderson Cancer Center CCSG [CA016672]
  6. Regional Ministry of Education of Castilla-la Mancha, Spain
  7. European Social Fund (ESF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies have implicated the innate immunity system in the pathogenesis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Toll-like receptor (TLR) genes encode key innate immunity signal initiators. We recently identified multiple genes, known to be regulated by TLRs, to be overexpressed in MDS bone marrow (BM) CD34+ cells, and hypothesized that TLR signaling is abnormally activated in MDS. We analyzed a large cohort of MDS cases and identified TLR1, TLR2 and TLR6 to be significantly overexpressed in MDS BM CD34+ cells. Deep sequencing followed by Sanger resequencing of TLR1, TLR2, TLR4 and TLR6 genes uncovered a recurrent genetic variant, TLR2-F217S, in 11% of 149 patients. Functionally, TLR2-F217S results in enhanced activation of downstream signaling including NF-kappa B activity after TLR2 agonist treatment. In cultured primary BM CD34+ cells of normal donors, TLR2 agonists induced histone demethylase JMJD3 and interleukin-8 gene expression. Inhibition of TLR2 in BM CD34+ cells from patients with lower-risk MDS using short hairpin RNA resulted in increased erythroid colony formation. Finally, RNA expression levels of TLR2 and TLR6, as well as presence of TLR2-F217S, are associated with distinct prognosis and clinical characteristics. These findings indicate that TLR2-centered signaling is deregulated in MDS, and that its targeting may have potential therapeutic benefit in MDS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据