4.7 Article

Monoclonal antibodies against ROR1 induce apoptosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells

期刊

LEUKEMIA
卷 26, 期 6, 页码 1348-1355

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2011.362

关键词

CLL; monoclonal antibodies; apoptosis

资金

  1. CLL Global Research Foundation
  2. EUCAAD under EU [200755]
  3. Cancer and Allergy Foundation
  4. Swedish Research Council/SIDA/SAREC
  5. Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education
  6. Swedish Cancer Society
  7. Cancer Society in Stockholm
  8. King Gustaf Vth Jubilee Fund, Vinnova
  9. Karolinska Institutet Foundations
  10. Stockholm County Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ROR1 is a receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) recently identified to be overexpressed at the gene and protein levels in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against RTKs have been successfully applied for therapy of solid tumors. We generated five MAbs against the Ig (n = 1), cysteine-rich (CRD) (n = 2) and kringle (KNG) (n = 2) domains, respectively, of the extracellular part of ROR1. All CLL patients (n = 20) expressed ROR1 on the surface of the leukemic cells. A significantly higher frequency of ROR1 expression was found in patients with progressive versus non-progressive disease, and in those with unmutated versus mutated IgVH genes. All five MAbs alone induced apoptosis in the absence of complement or added effector cells (Annexin-V and MTT, as well as cleavage of poly-(ADP ribose)-polymerase, caspase-8 and caspase-9) of CLL cells but not of normal B cells. Most effective were MAbs against CRD and KNG, significantly superior to rituximab (P<0.005). Cross-linking of anti-ROR1 MAbs using the F(ab')(2) fragments of anti-Fc antibodies significantly augmented apoptosis. Two of the MAbs induced complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) similar to that of rituximab and one anti-ROR1 MAb (KNG) (IgG1) showed killing activity by antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. The identified ROR1 epitopes may provide a basis for generating human ROR1 MAbs for therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据