4.7 Article

Improving efficiency and sensitivity: European Research Initiative in CLL (ERIC) update on the international harmonised approach for flow cytometric residual disease monitoring in CLL

期刊

LEUKEMIA
卷 27, 期 1, 页码 142-149

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2012.216

关键词

chronic lymphocytic leukaemia; minimal residual disease; flow cytometry

资金

  1. IntraSure
  2. Cariplo Foundation (Milan, Italy)
  3. Program Molecular Clinical Oncology-5 per mille number [9965]
  4. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC Milano, Italy)
  5. Progetti di Ricerca di Interesse Nazionale (PRIN - Ministry of education, University and Research - MIUR, Rome, Italy)
  6. Ricerca Finalizzata (Ministry of Health, Rome, Italy)
  7. LLR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) is becoming increasingly important as treatments improve. An internationally harmonised four-colour (CLR) flow cytometry MRD assay is widely used but has limitations. The aim of this study was to improve MRD analysis by identifying situations where a less time-consuming CD19/CD5/kappa/lambda analysis would be sufficient for detecting residual CLL, and develop a six-CLR antibody panel that is more efficient for cases requiring full MRD analysis. In 784 samples from CLL patients after treatment, it was possible to determine CD19/CD5/kappa/lambda thresholds that identified cases with detectable MRD with 100% positive predictive value (PPV). However, CD19/CD5/kappa/lambda analysis was unsuitable for predicting iwCLL/NCI response status or identifying cases with no detectable MRD. For the latter cases requiring a full MRD assessment, a six-CLR assay was designed comprising CD19/CD5/CD20 with (1) CD3/CD38/CD79b and (2) CD81/CD22/CD43. There was good correlation between four-CLR and six-CLR panels in dilution studies and clinical samples, with 100% concordance for detection of residual disease at the 0.01% (10(-4)) level (n = 59) and good linearity even at the 0.001-0.01% (10(-5)-10(-4)) level. A six-CLR panel therefore provides equivalent results to the four-CLR panel but it requires fewer reagents, fewer cells and a much simpler analysis approach. Leukemia (2013) 27, 142-149; doi:10.1038/leu.2012.216

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据