4.7 Article

Hypoxia-microRNA-16 downregulation induces VEGF expression in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive anaplastic large-cell lymphomas

期刊

LEUKEMIA
卷 25, 期 12, 页码 1882-1890

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2011.168

关键词

onco-ALK; lymphomas; microRNA; VEGF

资金

  1. INSERM
  2. Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer [A09/1/5073]
  3. Canceropole Grand-Sud-Ouest
  4. CITTIL (Cooperation Transpyreneenne de recherche de traitements innovants contre la leucemie)
  5. INCa
  6. La Fondation de France
  7. La Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), tyrosine kinase oncogene is implicated in a wide variety of cancers. In this study we used conditional onco-ALK (NPM-ALK and TPM3-ALK) mouse MEF cell lines (ALK+ fibroblasts) and transgenic models (ALK+ B-lymphoma) to investigate the involvement and regulation of angiogenesis in ALK tumor development. First, we observed that ALK expression leads to downregulation of miR-16 and increased Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) levels. Second, we found that modification of miR-16 levels in TPM3-ALK MEF cells greatly affected VEGF levels. Third, we demonstrated that miR-16 directly interacts with VEGF mRNA at the 3'-untranslated region and that the regulation of VEGF by miR-16 occurs at the translational level. Fourth, we showed that expression of both the ALK oncogene and hypoxia-induced factor 1 alpha (HIF1 alpha) is a prerequisite for miR-16 downregulation. Fifth, in vivo, miR-16 gain resulted in reduced angiogenesis and tumor growth. Finally, we highlighted an inverse correlation between the levels of miR-16 and VEGF in human NPM-ALK+ Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphomas (ALCL). Altogether, our results demonstrate, for the first time, the involvement of angiogenesis in ALK+ ALCL and strongly suggest an important role for hypoxia-miR-16 in regulating VEGF translation. Leukemia (2011) 25, 1882-1890; doi:10.1038/leu.2011.168; published online 22 July 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据