4.7 Article

Gene expression profiling in the leukemic stem cell-enriched CD34+ fraction identifies target genes that predict prognosis in normal karyotype AML

期刊

LEUKEMIA
卷 25, 期 12, 页码 1825-1833

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2011.172

关键词

Acute myeloid leukemia; gene expression profiling; leukemic stem cells; prognostic factors; CD34(+) cells; transcriptome analysis

资金

  1. UMCG, The Netherlands

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to identify acute myeloid leukemia (AML) CD34(+)-specific gene expression profiles, mononuclear cells from AML patients (n = 46) were sorted into CD34(+) and CD34(-) subfractions, and genome-wide expression analysis was performed using Illumina BeadChip Arrays. AML CD34(+) and CD34(-) gene expression was compared with a large group of normal CD34(+) bone marrow (BM) cells (n = 31). Unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis showed that CD34(+) AML samples belonged to a distinct cluster compared with normal BM and that in 61% of the cases the AML CD34(+) transcriptome did not cluster together with the paired CD34(-) transcriptome. The top 50 of AML CD34(+)-specific genes was selected by comparing the AML CD34(+) transcriptome with the AML CD34(-) and CD34(+) normal BM transcriptomes. Interestingly, for three of these genes, that is, ankyrin repeat domain 28 (ANKRD28), guanine nucleotide binding protein, alpha 15 (GNA15) and UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase 2 (UGP2), a high transcript level was associated with a significant poorer overall survival (OS) in two independent cohorts (n = 163 and n = 218) of normal karyotype AML. Importantly, the prognostic value of the continuous transcript levels of ANKRD28 (OS hazard ratio (HR): 1.32, P = 0.008), GNA15 (OS HR: 1.22, P = 0.033) and UGP2 (OS HR: 1.86, P = 0.009) was shown to be independent from the well-known risk factors FLT3-ITD, NPM1c(+) and CEBPA mutation status. Leukemia (2011) 25, 1825-1833; doi:10.1038/leu.2011.172; published online 15 July 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据