4.7 Article

Relationship between elevated immunoglobulin free light chain and the presence of IgH translocations in multiple myeloma

期刊

LEUKEMIA
卷 24, 期 8, 页码 1498-1505

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2010.128

关键词

multiple myeloma; translocations; free light chain; prognosis; survival

资金

  1. Public Health Service [CA23318, CA66636, CA21115, CA13650]
  2. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health
  3. Department of Health and Human Services

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Elevated immunoglobulin free light chain (FLC) level and abnormal FLC ratio are commonly seen in multiple myeloma (MM) and have prognostic implications. We hypothesized that presence of immunoglobin heavy chain (IgH) translocations leads to unbalanced production of light chains and more extreme abnormalities of FLC, and may explain the prognostic value of FLC. We studied 314 patients with newly diagnosed MM enrolled in a phase III trial, in whom results of fluorescence in situ hybridization testing and data on serum FLC levels were available. Cytogenetic analyses and FLC estimates were performed on stored samples and results were correlated with clinical data. The median ratio (FLC ratio) and the absolute difference (FLC diff) between the involved and uninvolved FLC were higher among those with IgH translocations, especially t(14;16). In multivariate analysis, the prognostic value of FLC estimates on progression-free and overall survival were independent of high-risk IgH translocations t(4; 14) and t(14; 16). A combination of the risk factors; either abnormal FLC estimate and/or the presence of high-risk IgH translocation, achieved better prognostic stratification. We conclude that patients with IgH translocations have higher FLC levels and abnormal ratios, but the prognostic effect of FLC is only partially explained by translocation status. A system including both these risk factors allows better prediction of outcome. Leukemia (2010) 24, 1498-1505; doi:10.1038/leu.2010.128; published online 3 June 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据