4.7 Article

IDH1 and IDH2 mutation studies in 1473 patients with chronic-, fibrotic- or blast-phase essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera or myelofibrosis

期刊

LEUKEMIA
卷 24, 期 7, 页码 1302-1309

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2010.113

关键词

JAK2; MPL; TET2; myeloproliferative

资金

  1. Myeloproliferative Disorders Foundation, Chicago, IL, USA
  2. Henry J. Predolin Foundation for Research in Leukemia, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
  3. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro-AIRC Milan, Italy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In a multi-institutional collaborative project, 1473 patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) were screened for isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1)/IDH2 mutations: 594 essential thrombocythemia (ET), 421 polycythemia vera (PV), 312 primary myelofibrosis (PMF), 95 post-PV/ET MF and 51 blast-phase MPN. A total of 38 IDH mutations (18 IDH1-R132, 19 IDH2-R140 and 1 IDH2-R172) were detected: 5 (0.8%) ET, 8 (1.9%) PV, 13 (4.2%) PMF, 1 (1%) post-PV/ET MF and 11 (21.6%) blast-phase MPN (P < 0.01). Mutant IDH was documented in the presence or absence of JAK2, MPL and TET2 mutations, with similar mutational frequencies. However, IDH-mutated patients were more likely to be nullizygous for JAK2 46/1 haplotype, especially in PMF (P = 0.04), and less likely to display complex karyotype, in blast-phase disease (P < 0.01). In chronic-phase PMF, JAK2 46/1 haplotype nullizygosity (P < 0.01; hazard ratio (HR) 2.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-5.2), but not IDH mutational status (P = 0.55; HR 1.3, 95% CI 0.5-3.4), had an adverse effect on survival. This was confirmed by multivariable analysis. In contrast, in both blast-phase PMF (P = 0.04) and blast-phase MPN (P = 0.01), the presence of an IDH mutation predicted worse survival. The current study clarifies disease- and stage-specific IDH mutation incidence and prognostic relevance in MPN and provides additional evidence for the biological effect of distinct JAK2 haplotypes. Leukemia (2010) 24, 1302-1309; doi:10.1038/leu.2010.113; published online 27 May 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据