4.7 Article

Integrated use of minimal residual disease classification and IKZF1 alteration status accurately predicts 79% of relapses in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia

期刊

LEUKEMIA
卷 25, 期 2, 页码 254-258

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2010.275

关键词

Ikaros; IKZF1; minimal residual disease (MRD); pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL); prognostic value; relapse prediction

资金

  1. Dutch Cancer Society [KUN2009-4298, EMCR2006-3547, SNWLK 97-1567, SNWLK 2000-2268]
  2. Quality of Life Gala Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Response to therapy as determined by minimal residual disease (MRD) is currently used for stratification in treatment protocols for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, the large MRD-based medium risk group (MRD-M; 50-60% of the patients) harbors many relapses. We analyzed MRD in 131 uniformly treated precursor-B-ALL patients and evaluated whether combined MRD and IKZF1 (Ikaros zinc finger-1) alteration status can improve risk stratification. We confirmed the strong prognostic significance of MRD classification, which was independent of IKZF1 alterations. Notably, 8 of the 11 relapsed cases in the large MRD-M group (n = 81; 62%) harbored an IKZF1 alteration. Integration of both MRD and IKZF1 status resulted in a favorable outcome group (n = 104; 5 relapses) and a poor outcome group (n = 27; 19 relapses), and showed a stronger prognostic value than each of the established risk factors alone (hazard ratio (95%CI): 24.98 (8.29-75.31)). Importantly, whereas MRD and IKZF1 status alone identified only 46 and 54% of the relapses, respectively, their integrated use allowed prediction of 79% of all the relapses with 93% specificity. Because of the unprecedented sensitivity in upfront relapse prediction, the combined parameters have high potential for future risk stratification, particularly for patients originally classified as non-high risk, such as the large group of MRD-M patients. Leukemia (2011) 25, 254-258; doi:10.1038/leu.2010.275; published online 19 November 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据